The level of information it throws back is helpful." "Defender for Endpoint is a robust solution that works well out-of-the-box." Microsoft Defender was like a one-stop for most things because it gave us the vulnerability and patching scores so that our vulnerability management teams can focus on covering up the vulnerabilities and the patching team can check the vulnerable versions and deploy the right versions." "We have very good visibility on our endpoints. For example, our company wanted to go with CIS, but we didn't have a proper way of measuring whether the endpoints have the right standards in place or whether they were compliant with CIS. It is continuously online." "Real-time detection and cloud-based delivery of detections are highly efficient." "The solution's latest features for threat analysis are updated to provide us with future protection against the latest threats worldwide." "We had certain compliance and usage issues. It has a very large database of places or sites on the internet where you should not go. It also offers centralized management so I can remotely manage devices." "It is a very advanced system based on AI. That is the most important feature of the product. "The performance of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been a valuable feature." "The solution's threat protection is mostly AI and machine-learning based. Some reviewers also felt that the ease of deployment could be improved. All other things being more or less equal, our reviewers found Cortex XDR rather expensive to purchase. Service and Support: Users of both solutions note that, for the most part, they are supported by excellent technological support teams.Ĭomparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint seems to be a slightly superior solution.Reviewers of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint point out that it is integrated into Windows, which reduces the cost of the solution. Pricing: Most users of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks feel that it is an expensive solution.However, users note that it should provide better support for third-party solutions. Users of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint find it to be reliable and point out that it has many valuable features, including the control that it provides by being built into Windows and its automated threat investigation and response. However, there are users who feel that its reporting capabilities could be improved. Features: Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks users find it to be reliable and point out that it has many valuable features, including its centralized dashboard and its ability to integrate with other solutions.With few exceptions, users of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint feel that the fact that it is built into Windows 10 makes it much easier to roll out. Ease of Deployment: Most users of both solutions feel that deploying them is relatively easy and straightforward. ![]() After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Cortex XDR and Microsoft defender for endpoint based on our users’ reviews in four categories.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |